Reconnecting Health and Housing: Philanthropy's New Opportunity
نویسنده
چکیده
The connection between health and housing was widely understood by nineteenth century social reformers and philanthropists and was the dominant framework for low-income housing until the early twentieth century. The Affordable Care Act has not only set in motion reform in the nation’s health care system, but also opens up new opportunities for re-connecting the housing and health sectors. While housing affordability will remain the central challenge for lowand middle-income people, the strong evidence of how housing quality and affordability impacts health calls for a new framework that envisions housing as a platform for improving quality of life. This platform can be conceived as a multi-layered: as service delivery portal, as target for prevention, and as anchor for healthy neighborhoods. These layers are associated with different at-risk populations and different strategies for financing and policy action. Philanthropy can play a key role in re-connecting the sectors through its capacity to build the evidence base, change the discourse about housing, foster policy change, and promote innovation. Florence Nightingale’s observation about the connection between health and housing would have found a receptive audience among her contemporaries. It reflected what had become a broadly shared view on both sides of the Atlantic towards the burgeoning tenements and slums of a rapidly urbanizing England and America. In America, waves of immigration increased the urban population from 300,000 in 1800 to 54 million by 1920. The immigrant poor were housed in dark, crowded, unventilated, and unsanitary slums, which became hotbeds for major outbreaks of diseases such as cholera, typhus, small pox, and yellow fever. Middle class social reformers, including physicians, joined with philanthropists to mount a social movement to address the problem. Reformers led the fight to improve sanitation, ventilation, and other housing related conditions—efforts which led to the creation of the modern public health system. Philanthropists were instrumental in the creation of model tenements and ‘‘social housing.’’ Both wealthy individuals and early industrialists helped build such housing for the growing factory working class, becoming a precursor for the public housing of the twentieth century. Reform efforts did not stop at housing amelioration, but also extended to direct charitable work and public Mr. Fukuzawa is the managing director of the Kresge Foundation’s Health program in Troy, Michigan. Mr. Karnas is a senior fellow at the Kresge Foundation in Troy, Michigan. Howard Frumkin, Lawrence Frank, Richard Jackson, Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities (Island Press, 2004), 52–53; Lawrence Frank, Peter Engelke, Thomas Schmid, Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity (Island Press, 2003), 12–13. Russ Lopez, ‘‘Public Health, the APHA, and Urban Renewal,’’ American Journal of Public Health 99 (Sept. 2009), 1603. Peter Dreier, ‘‘Philanthropy and the Housing Crisis: The Dilemmas of Private Charity and Public Policy,’’ Housing Policy Debate 8:1 (1997), 235–293, DOI: 10.1080/10511482.1997, 9521253, 239–240. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Volume 8, Number 3, 2015 a Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/env.2015.0006
منابع مشابه
The 1998 National Symposium on Homelessness Research
Homeless people are, by definition, isolated from mainstream society. They lack stable housing, and often lack connections with jobs, families, and communities. This paper summarizes what we know about reconnecting homeless people and individuals into the community and in turn fostering self-sufficiency, including improving their residential stability and employability, and reuniting them with ...
متن کاملMoving to opportunity: an experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health.
OBJECTIVES The health consequences of neighborhood poverty are a public health problem. Data were obtained to examine links between neighborhood residence and mental health outcomes. METHODS Moving to Opportunity was a randomized, controlled trial in which families from public housing in high-poverty neighborhoods were moved into private housing in near-poor or nonpoor neighborhoods, with a s...
متن کاملMr. Neville Chamberlain's Opportunity
Sir.?The aims of your paper in regard to the public health, as set out in your New Year's issue, are excellent. And as everyone seems to be waking up at last to the fact that the housing question overshadows every other question in domestic politics, perhaps something will be accomplished. Questions of housing and health must not, however, be allowed to become the playthings of politics. Every ...
متن کاملجمـعیتشناسی سالـمندان در استان ایـلام
Introduction and purpose: Aging population is a new phenomenon in Iran which is due to several reasons such as decrease in birth rate, increase in medical advances, health, education and prolonged life expectancy. The current study aim to investigate economic and social aspects of elderly population such as median age of population, dependency ratio, sex ratio, marital status, litearcy and empl...
متن کاملHousing mobility and adolescent mental health: The role of substance use, social networks, and family mental health in the moving to opportunity study
The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment was a housing mobility program begun in the mid-nineties that relocated volunteer low income families from public housing to rental units in higher opportunity neighborhoods in 5 US cities, using the Section 8 affordable housing voucher program. Compared to the control group who stayed behind in public housing, the MTO voucher group exhibited a harmful...
متن کامل